Steven Schveighoffer Wrote: > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:26:35 -0400, Sean Kelly <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I could simply change it to a function that accepts a scope delegate. It > > just isn't as efficient as the alias approach. But an indirect call is > > pretty small potatoes in this case anyway. I tried this and it worked, > > and the I ran into an issue where the object used for the lock > > (classinfo for GCLock) was apparently null. I'll look into that today. > > Well, the alias version could be used for other callable types, whereas a > delegate version can only be used for delegates. Not sure how important > it is.
I think there needs to be a solution for this in the general case, but for this specific application it doesn't matter.
