Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> Hum, my impression is that Git is actually pretty mindful about data
> integrity, not just on history, but on commits as well. However, it also
> seems like Git was designed with Linux in mind, so Git on Windows is
> kinda like a second-class platform (for example, performance is
> apparently lower on Windows). But hopefully that will improve on the
> future.
>
Performance was actually horrendous on windows last year, not just
"lower".
> The comments above made tip my preference slightly over to Mercurial.
> But I think ultimately the decision of whether I would use Mercurial or
> Git would be decided more by external factors, like the quality of
> IDE-integrated tools (read: Eclipse plugins), and the availability or
> preference of those DVCS in hosting-sites/organizations. For example
> Google Code only supports Mercurial. On the other hand the Eclipse
> Foundation is moving their repositories to Git. (if it wasn't for that
> I'd likely have gone with Mercurial and not looked back on Git)
>
I don't know how good it is, but I believe there is an Eclipse
plugin for Mercurial.
Jerome
--
mailto:[email protected]
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
