klickverbot wrote: > On 11/18/10 8:20 PM, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote: >> Performance was actually horrendous on windows last year, not just >> "lower". > > That's what you say. > > I say that I've been happily using Git on Windows for over two years > without noticing any performance problems. > > Now what?
Well, I went back to the message I posted at the time (on June 6
2009 in digitalmars.D) and I need to amend that: "git clone"
performance is horrendous (more than 4 times slower than Mercurial).
Other commands are generally slightly slower than Mercurial but
acceptable, except import from SVN which took several hours for Git
and 5min for Mercurial (but that is not too important since you
don't import from SVN every day, clone performance is a lot more
problematic IMO).
Jerome
--
mailto:[email protected]
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
