Leandro Lucarella Wrote: > > Being a unix tool means it works only on unix? > > I said it in the sense of the "unix philosophy"[1].
Does it work on windows? And does it work there well? > > If it rebuilds something, why it's not a build system? > > Call it whatever you want. What I meant is that it doesn't suppose to do > everything one could ask for a "build system" nowdays, like automatic > dependency handling, automatic installation, configuration, etc. Explicit dependency handling is ok, but it doesn't work: dir/a.o: a.c dir move a.o dir/ dir: mkdir dir What to do? Do you call this "works well"?
