On 09/12/2011 04:07 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 9/11/2011 4:53 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
The problem is, the disabled default constructor of a *member* is making
a wrapper class's constructor to be disabled as well:
Right. It's infectious. This is deliberate.
> I think this is at least limiting and very
likely a bug.
It's deliberate. It's likely that we can find ways to loosen things up
in the future, but the idea is to screw it down tight, first, instead of
allowing big holes.
But how we can find the holes if we cannot even try things because they
are screwed down tight? I think the right approach would be to loosen
things up (without declaring them a complete feature, "resounding
success", etc.), identify the holes and *then* seal the holes if
possible or discard the whole idea as infeasible.
