On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:44:26 -0400, Timon Gehr <[email protected]> wrote:
Yes, that is what I meant. It already does that:
struct S{
this() @disable;
}
class C{
S s;
this(){} // Error: constructor tt.C.this field s must be
initialized in constructor
}
The only thing that needs to be changed is that classes containing
non-default-constructible uninitialized fields can be default
constructed if they provide a default constructor.
Oh wow, this really is a no-brainer. Walter?
At least there should be an enhancement report.
-Steve
