On 8/1/12 6:23 PM, David wrote:
I think the best way here is to define a BufferedRange that takes any other range and supplies a buffer for it (with the appropriate primitives) in a native array.AndreiDon't you think, this range stuff is overdone? Define some fancy Range stuff, if an array just works perfectly? Ranges > Iterators, yes, but I think they are overdone.
I don't. Andrei
