On Wednesday, 1 August 2012 at 22:31:39 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 8/1/12 6:23 PM, David wrote:
Ranges > Iterators, yes, but I think they are overdone.
I don't.
I think the main problem is that you need that abstraction
for Phobos. Whereas if you're writing stuff for yourself,
you don't bother. Even if it's a library for consumption.
I wonder if there's an abstraction that would make defining
a range around some data trivial. Maybe even just a good
article on "why use ranges over X" where X == array of data,
or iterators for the C++ crowd.
I know in SDC's lexer we actually do have things that could
be turned into input and output ranges fairly trivially.
I would be concerned with potential performance ramifications,
though.
-Bernard.
