On 13-01-04 11:50 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, January 04, 2013 17:35:32 Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]>wrote:
On Friday, January 04, 2013 15:03:42 deadalnix wrote:
Isn't that feature supposed to be here in that form for strategic
reasons and should remains kind of hidden ?
Yeah. I thought that UDAs were supposed to be undocumented for the moment?
????
They were shoved out the door without being fully sorted out first instead of
being done on a separate branch first and sorted out there prior to being
released. I thought that we had decided that they'd be in 2.061 but
undocumented for the moment so that people could use them but that they
wouldn't be put in the docs until they had been fully sorted out so that they
could be properly treated as experimental.
- Jonathan M Davis
If this is the case, why not add the mention "experimental" inside the
documentation? Readers (users and developers) would be aware of the new
feature and the fact that it might change or go away.
/Pierre
