On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]>wrote:
> > They were shoved out the door without being fully sorted out first instead > of > being done on a separate branch first and sorted out there prior to being > released. Yeah. OK, water under the bridge. > I thought that we had decided that they'd be in 2.061 but > undocumented for the moment so that people could use them I'm afraid I see a slight contradiction in the previous statement :) but that they wouldn't be put in the docs until they had been fully sorted > out so that they > could be properly treated as experimental. Er... I propose this: - update the changelog to say UDA are implemented, but are potentially subject to change. Use them, people, and report! - merge Jacob's pull request to have a documentation. Proeminently put a warning in the docs saying this is an experimental feature (I know, this should be a parallel branch, that's not the case, give it a rest). - collect impression in 1-2 months. I mean, how can the devs hope for any return on UDA if they are an Easter egg feature?
