On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 08:20:38 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 07:49:49 UTC, ilya-stromberg wrote:
Do you have any plans to change license from GPLv3 to something more liberal like Boost, MIT or BSD? Without this it's impossible to use your library for commercial purposes.

The licence is GPLv3+ because the code is closely influenced by igraph, which is GPLv3-licensed. It's not like there's copy-pasting, but it's not clean-room either, so offering a permissive licence might put users in an invidious situation if the igraph authors chose to make an issue of it. Unlikely, but better safe than sorry.

If anyone wants to use it in a commercial application the best thing probably to let me know and I can discuss with the igraph authors. I will probably do so anyway once the library is more feature-complete, less out of concern for commercial apps than in order not to be incompatible with other free licenses.

I see. You can use Boost Graph Library (BGL) as a initial point. It's under Boost license that allows commercial usage.

Also, it would be nice to have graph library in Phobos in a future, and in that case module must be under Boost license.

But yes, you can try to contact igraph authors - maybe they let you change the license.

Reply via email to