On Oct 9, 2013 12:31 PM, "Kagamin" <s...@here.lot> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 13:59:22 UTC, Meta wrote: >> >> I haven't really thought about this before, but it's becoming increasingly difficult for me to come up with a contemporary simple language. It seems most modern languages are creeping towards more complexity. > > > I heard, Lua interpreter implementation is very small, if this counts as simplicity.
Size is by no means whatsoever a valid counter for simplicity. Regards -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';