On Oct 9, 2013 12:31 PM, "Kagamin" <s...@here.lot> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 13:59:22 UTC, Meta wrote:
>>
>> I haven't really thought about this before, but it's becoming
increasingly difficult for me to come up with a contemporary simple
language. It seems most modern languages are creeping towards more
complexity.
>
>
> I heard, Lua interpreter implementation is very small, if this counts as
simplicity.

Size is by no means whatsoever a valid counter for simplicity.

Regards
-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';

Reply via email to