On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 20:37:56 +0000, Jonathan Crapuchettes wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 20:27:01 +0000, Jonathan Crapuchettes wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:08:50 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> Ok, this is it:
>> First, I would like to thank everyone who has put hard work into the
>> latest release and am really excited about the enhancements and fixed
>> Second, I agree with others that this should have been 2.064, not
>> 2.064.2. This is an initial release not a patch/minor release.
>> Third, the fix for the issue at https://d.puremagic.com/issues/
>> show_bug.cgi?id=10690 was not included in the release and is a blocking
>> bug for my company's code base. Till there is a new release with that
>> fix included, we will not be able to use 2.064.
>> Many thanks again for a great programming language,
>> Jonathan from EMSI
> I just double checked the code in issue 10690 and it works just fine. I
> had assumed that my code was similar enough to not have been worth an
> additional bug report. I was wrong. I'll log a bug report and try to
> work around the assertion failure in std.algorithm.
> Thanks again,
Disregard the last post. The issue still exists; I was just looking at
the wrong file.