Re: Scott Meyers' DConf 2014 keynote "The Last Thing D Needs"

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Sat, 31 May 2014 18:56:17 -0400, Timon Gehr <timon.g...@gmx.ch> wrote:
On 05/30/2014 02:37 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:


in which case

static if(cond) {
immutable:
}

int x;

should not create x as immutable if cond is true. The current
behavior is not consistent with attribute either.

Ugh, that is really bad. It shouldn't do that. Is that intentional?

enum cond=true;

static if(cond){
immutable:
}

int x;
static assert(is(typeof(x)==int));

What is the problem?

OK, so the original premise is not true? I was assuming deadalnix was  
saying x would be immutable.

-Steve