On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 17:09:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/26/2014 8:30 AM, Mike wrote:
Regardless of where stdcpp goes, one issue is that the stuff in it goes into the namespace "std", which conflicts with Phobos' "std" higher level package name.
wow. I remember the hot debate about the name o the standard library back then.
Remember proposition dsl (D standard library) anyone? and your (sad) comment: "Nobody likes phobos" :)
