On 3/5/2015 1:04 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
It would be good if the D implemented D parser were though. Parsing to
create an AST is needed for many things. If each tool in the tool
chain implements it's own… it just seems wrong.


True, but on the other hand, a D lexer and parser are pretty simple.
              • Re: df... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: df... Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: df... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: df... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: df... Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: df... FG via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: df... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: df... Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: df... Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: df... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: df... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: df... Brian Schott via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: df... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: df... Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: df... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: dfmt 0.1.0 Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: dfmt 0.1.0 ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce
  • Re: dfmt 0.1.0 ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce

Reply via email to