On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 11:33:03 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Please respond to this post with a comment starting with a single "Yes"/"No" and optional explanation after that. Criteria you are expected to evaluate as part of "Yes":
Yes.
Re: Voting for std.experimental.allocator
ponce via Digitalmars-d-announce Wed, 08 Jul 2015 05:46:21 -0700
- Voting for std.experiment... Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Voting for std.e... Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Voting for std.e... Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Voting for std.e... wobbles via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Voting for std.e... Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Voting for std.e... ponce via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Voting for std.e... Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Voting for std.e... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Voting for std.e... ZombineDev via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Voting for std.e... Justin Whear via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Voting for std.e... Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Voting for std.e... John Colvin via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Voting for std.e... HaraldZealot via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Voting for std.e... extrawurst via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Voting for std.e... Nordlöw
- Re: Voting for std.e... MrSmith via Digitalmars-d-announce
