On 1 September 2015 at 15:57, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Steven Schveighoffer via > Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > >> [snip] >> I'm not a dmd dev, but I'm not sure it will be accepted, since phobos is >> very unstable. We have to be cautious about making dmd breakable easily by >> a change to phobos. >> [snip] > > -Steve >> > > Surely this is a code coverage issue then? > Are there any unit tests in ddmd? > >From how I see it, Phobos is constantly adding, silently breaking, deprecating, and removing. We need long term backwards compatibility, and Phobos just doesn't fit in that picture (yet).
