On 1 September 2015 at 15:57, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Steven Schveighoffer via
> Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>> [snip]
>> I'm not a dmd dev, but I'm not sure it will be accepted, since phobos is
>> very unstable. We have to be cautious about making dmd breakable easily by
>> a change to phobos.
>> [snip]
> -Steve
> Surely this is a code coverage issue then?
> Are there any unit tests  in ddmd?

>From how I see it, Phobos is constantly adding, silently breaking,
deprecating, and removing.  We need long term backwards compatibility, and
Phobos just doesn't fit in that picture (yet).

Reply via email to