On Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 16:24:33 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 15:53:22 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Of course you didn't. In C you can mutate const object without cast. But it's not an issue because it's not what is usually done and usually const works as expected.

No. Const objects are read only. Writing to read only objects would be undefined behaviour.

That's why there's no choice other than trust developer to do the expected thing.
      • Re: cpp_binder, a... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • Re: cpp_binde... Paul O'Neil via Digitalmars-d-announce
          • Re: cpp_b... Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • Re: ... Marc Schütz via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
  • Re: cpp_binder, a not-yet-... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce

Reply via email to