On Saturday, 24 October 2015 at 15:40:41 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Saturday, 24 October 2015 at 03:11:30 UTC, Joakim wrote:
The associated travis CI run that finally went green with ldc 0.16.0 beta 2 took about as long as the other D compilers, so performance of ldc-compiled ddmd seems comparable:


That's surprising given that many were worried that switching to ddmd would slow compilation speeds down by at least 30%. Also, this does not seem to be using any of ldc's optimization flags.

Well, all three of those are ddmd: the only difference is whether ddmd is compiled by dmd, gdc, or ldc. The 30% measurement was based on comparing the previously completely C++ dmd with ddmd:


Reply via email to