On 01/29/2016 11:09 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 28 January 2016 at 19:46:48 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Use dpldocs.info. We have good docs.
That's orthogonal to this.
It is just another example of why I feel it is necessary to take a
different direction than dmd.
I see. Good point. You've probably answered this elsewhere, but I don't
recall: Does that parse the source for comments on its own or does it
still use dmd's json (or html) output? Unless it does the parsing 100%
on its own, then it would still suffer from the issue that PR addresses.