On Friday, 17 June 2016 at 23:17:56 UTC, Xinok wrote:
On Friday, 17 June 2016 at 22:15:47 UTC, ketmar wrote:
i put it under unlicense[1], as some other works of the same author is using it, and it is basically the same PD.

[1] http://unlicense.org/

Unfortunately, using unlicense is just as problematic as using public domain:


alas, that is all i can do without breaking the "spirit" of the original terms. i'm ok with it, and people still can fork the code and relicense in under Boost/MIT.

Reply via email to