On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 06:31:49 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 05:27:12 UTC, chmike wrote:
Ending strings with a single null byte/char is to save space. It was critical in the 70´s when C was created and memory space was very limited. That's not the case anymore and I guess the

Not only to save space, some CPUs also had cheap incrementing load/stores and branching on zero is faster than sacrificing another register for a counter.

I incidentally just found my 1992 implementation for Motorola 68K, to illustrate:

                move.l  4(sp),a1        ; pointer for destination
                move.l  8(sp),a0        ; pointer for source

mystrcpy        move.l  a0,d0
1$              move.b  (a0)+,(a1)+ ; copy
                bne.s   1$                 ; jump back up if not zero

As you can see it is a tight loop. Other CPUs are even tighter, and have single-instruction loops (even 8086?)

So not only storage, also performance on specific CPUs. Which is a good reason for keeping datatypes in standard libraries abstract, different CPUs favour different representations. Even on very basic datatypes.

Reply via email to