On Tuesday, 28 June 2016 at 03:11:26 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 June 2016 at 01:53:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
If we were in interview, I'd ask you "what does this returns
if you pass it an empty string ?"
I'd say use this one instead, to avoid negative size_t. It is
also a little faster for the same measurement.
nothrow pure size_t strlen2(const(char)* c) {
if (c is null)
return 0;
const(char)* c_save = c;
while (*c){ c+=4; }
while (*c==0){ c--; }
c++;
return c - c_save;
}
2738
540
2744
If we were in an interview, I would insist.
