On Friday, 12 August 2016 at 12:51:26 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
I'm not sure I follow. I'm looking for the ability to guarantee that a pointer to a stack-allocated entity will not go out of scope

... more precisely, that the pointer will not become invalid because the data it points to goes out of scope.

            • R... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
  • Re: DIP1000: Scoped Poi... Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-announce
  • Re: DIP1000: Scoped Poi... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: DIP1000: Scope... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: DIP1000: Scope... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: DIP1000: S... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • Re: DIP100... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
          • Re: DI... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • R... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Guillaume Chatelet via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce

Reply via email to