On Friday, 12 August 2016 at 12:51:26 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
I'm not sure I follow. I'm looking for the ability to
guarantee that a pointer to a stack-allocated entity will not
go out of scope
... more precisely, that the pointer will not become invalid
because the data it points to goes out of scope.
- R... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP1000: Scoped Poi... Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP1000: Scoped Poi... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP1000: Scope... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP1000: Scope... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP1000: S... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP100... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DI... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
- R... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Guillaume Chatelet via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce