On 08/15/2016 03:41 PM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > scope rnd = new Rnd; // reference semantic and stack allocated > auto rnd2 = rnd; > > rnd.i = 2; > assert(rnd2.i == 2); > return rnd2;
Point is that that would become illegal if DIP1000 is implemented thus giving scope class concept more justification. It would still have @safe holes though because proposed `scope` does not work through many indirection levels - but better than existing situation when nothing is checked.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
