On 8/16/2016 6:01 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:01:05AM +0000, Chris Wright via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:55:40 +0000, Dicebot wrote:You need to add one more level of indirection for things to start going complicated.Presumably scope is transitive, so things shouldn't get horribly complex.I thought the DIP states the scope is *not* transitive?
It is not transitive.
