On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:53:37 +0300, Dicebot wrote: > On 08/17/2016 04:01 AM, Chris Wright wrote: >> On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:55:40 +0000, Dicebot wrote: >>> You need to add one more level of indirection for things to start >>> going complicated. >> >> Presumably scope is transitive, so things shouldn't get horribly >> complex. > > It is not transitive and it is not a type qualifier.
Non-scope is transitive, rather -- you can't have a non-scope pointer to a scope item (at least in @safe code).
