On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:53:37 +0300, Dicebot wrote:

> On 08/17/2016 04:01 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:55:40 +0000, Dicebot wrote:
>>> You need to add one more level of indirection for things to start
>>> going complicated.
>> 
>> Presumably scope is transitive, so things shouldn't get horribly
>> complex.
> 
> It is not transitive and it is not a type qualifier.

Non-scope is transitive, rather -- you can't have a non-scope pointer to 
a scope item (at least in @safe code).

Reply via email to