On Sunday, 8 January 2017 at 22:14:36 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:

1) -fno-rtti should be a flag that is honoured by the compiler.

The more I think about it the more I dislike the whole idea of -fno-rtti. All I've ever wanted from the D compiler is to not put code in my binary that has not chance of ever being used. Or, to generate it in a way that can be garbage collected by the linker.

If that dream came true, I could avoid RTTI by simply avoiding any feature that needed it (REALLY needed it!) and -fno-rtti would be of no value, except to enforce policy.

Reply via email to