On 01/27/2017 01:29 PM, Nordlöw wrote:
> On Friday, 27 January 2017 at 11:12:22 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> And also stuff like https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1740 - I
>> think the story behind `return scope` is the critical point for me. It
>> is worst technical disaster that has happened to compiler in years,
>> and I am going to blame Walter personally for it.
> So what would the alternative be?

Alternative would be to implement new functionality like a responsible
developer - keep it in sync with specification document, design set of
acceptance tests and do all the development in a separate branch until
is verified to both have desired semantics and don't cause any breakage
in existing projects. And don't rush into forcing usage of half-done
feature inside standard library the very moment it got released.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to