On 7/16/17 1:04 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/16/17 9:10 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
Congratulations to Timon Gehr. Not only was his "Static foreach" DIP
accepted, it picked up a good deal of praise from Walter & Andrei.
Indeed. Kudos to Timon (and thanks Mike for driving the process). This
is a well done DIP that many others could draw inspiration from. -- Andrei
What is the resolution of how break statements affect static
i.e. this section:
"As some consider this to be potentially confusing, it has been
suggested that break and continue directly inside static foreach should
instead be compiler errors and require explicit labels. This DIP leaves
this decision to the language authors, but recommends the above semantics."