On Thursday, 24 January 2019 at 09:47:46 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
Given the simplicity of the fixes for the problems identified I really don't think thats the best way forward. One round of forum review + formal reassessment ought to be enough.
Yes, please! Let not restart the whole dip process for this! The DIP is very lengthy as it currently is, and just encourage the notation of "where good work goes to die" if this have to go through the process all over again.

-Alex

Reply via email to