On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 6:35 PM Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 1/24/2019 4:31 PM, 12345swordy wrote: > > And wait for another 180+ days for a fix? Come on dude, can you understand > > the > > frustration being display here? > > Of course it's frustrating. On the other hand, we've had a lot of problems > stemming from implementing features without thoroughly understanding them. > > Rvalue references have a lot of subtleties to them, and we should not rush > into > it, especially since these issues only turned up at the last minute.
"Rush"? We've literally been debating this since my first post on this forum... like, 10 years ago. It's the issue I specifically joined this forum to complain about.
