On Friday, 25 January 2019 at 07:02:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/24/2019 4:21 PM, Elie Morisse wrote:
I didn't see that coming and I'm deeply frustrated and
disappointed by this review and rejection.
On the contrary. It is good to find conceptual errors before
implementing it.
You mean the conceptual errors you made when reviewing it? Like:
That the conflation of pass by reference to avoid copying and
mutation is not only deliberate but also mitigated by @disable.
That the DIP applies to statements, not expressions.
That the construction order issue is trivially fixable, by
specifying the same behaviour as the non ref case modulo ref.
