On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 at 10:39:08 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
In large scale projects this will become a big problem as you can't assume that every developer knows about all the contracts of a superclass.

That's the beauty of `override in(false)` - you don't have to know about the superclass. You can use it and it works in all cases.

Though that's also a possible argument for the language change.
  • interfaces and contracts -... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: interfaces and co... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: interfaces an... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • Re: interface... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce
          • Re: inter... Robert M. Münch via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • Re: ... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Robert M. Münch via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce

Reply via email to