On Friday, 7 February 2020 at 15:05:13 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
True companies have convinced themselves that only licences that allow stealing of others' intellectual work are acceptable to business, but then that is the point, they can steal the intellectual work with impugnity.

A rant of my own:

The push against the GPL is mostly by those who want free software to mean "free labor". GPL software can be dual licensed. Companies can pay for an alternative licensing arrangement if it's that valuable to them. Instead they want "free" software that allows them to avoid payment while imposing restrictions on how others use the software.
  • FeedSpot Recognizes the Gt... Ron Tarrant via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: FeedSpot Recogniz... M.M. via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: FeedSpot Recogniz... Bastiaan Veelo via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: FeedSpot Reco... Ron Tarrant via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • Re: FeedSpot ... Patrick Schluter via Digitalmars-d-announce
          • Re: FeedS... Ron Tarrant via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • Re: ... Andre Pany via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Les De Ridder via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Andre Pany via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Andre Pany via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Andre Pany via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Les De Ridder via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... sarn via Digitalmars-d-announce

Reply via email to