On Friday, 22 May 2020 at 00:50:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/21/2020 2:44 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
One concern here is that these responses are scattered across
different parts of a long discussion thread. So it probably
would be a good idea for the acceptance to be accompanied by
an explanation of what the major objections were to the DIP,
and why they were discounted.
It's not so different from the way that, at the end of a talk
or presentation, it's a good idea to recap the key points that
have already been covered.
Fair enough. I'll do so. Stay tuned.
Thank you.
Having an explanation on why the DIP is accepted despite being
highly controversial would be sufficient.
-Alex
