On Sunday, 24 May 2020 at 05:43:45 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:

@safe is advertised to give mechanical guarantees, where @trusted is a way for programmers to take responsibility for parts of the code. It is not advertised to be an unsound linter with pseudo-pragmatic trade-offs and implicit false negatives.

And turns back to my previous question, that Walter (or Atila) never replied: what I need to reply back to customers asking us about @safe.

@safe is for mechanical check or not?

An official and public declaration please.

/P


          • Re: DI... ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • R... Arafel via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • R... Arine via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • R... ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • R... Arine via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • R... ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • R... Arine via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • R... ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d-announce
  • Re: DIP1028 - Rationale... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: DIP1028 - Rati... Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: DIP1028 - ... Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: DIP1028 - ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • Re: DIP102... Panke via Digitalmars-d-announce
          • Re: DI... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • R... Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • R... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • R... Johannes Loher via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • R... rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • R... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • Re: DIP102... Johannes Loher via Digitalmars-d-announce

Reply via email to