Re: DIP1028 - Rationale for accepting as is

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Sunday, 24 May 2020 at 09:47:37 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
It's a fair point, but without the source code the distinction 
is meaningless.

It's meaningless in terms of what the compiler can check, but 
it's not meaningless in terms of documenting the assumptions and 
promises the developer is making.