On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 12:41 +0000, Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: […] > > Concepts, coroutines, and modules are already in ISO C++20.
Only once the standard is voted in. :-) Also ranges are in I believe. > And co-routines are in a much better story than the incompatible > runtimes currently existing for Rust async/await story. I have not used C++ co-routines, but having used Rust co-routines, they seem fine. You need to make good on your negative criticism – which I would like to hear. > Rust still needs to improve a lot on its tooling and ecosystem to > cover many of the scenarios we use C++ for, even if is safer. I can believe that may be true for others, but for me JetBrains CLion, Rustup, and Cargo make for an excellent environment. crates.io works very well – better than CLion, CMake, and lots of manual hacking around to get libraries for C++. > Already the fact that it lacks an ISO standard is a no go in many > domains. That is a choice for those organisations. I am guessing those organisations do not use Java, D, Python, etc. > I guess you mean using Python as glue for GPGU libraries written > in C++. In C, but yes. Though I haven't done it in a while now. -- Russel. =========================================== Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part