On Saturday, 19 February 2022 at 20:26:45 UTC, Elronnd wrote:
On Saturday, 19 February 2022 at 17:33:07 UTC, matheus wrote:
By the way English isn't my first language but I think there
is a small typo:
"In D, such nuances are fewer, for header files are not
required."
I think it's missing the word "example":
"In D, such nuances are fewer, for example header files are
not required."
I think it is fine as is.
Yes, this is a perfectly correct use of "for" as a coordinating
conjunction. [1] It may come across as a bit formal or
old-fashioned, though—in normal speech, you'd usually use "since".
[1] https://writing.wisc.edu/handbook/grammarpunct/coordconj/
