http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2625
------- Comment #7 from ma...@pochta.ru 2009-04-04 09:16 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > That bit talks about the whole struct being declared const. it talks about members too. > > I meant, it's correct that error is given for broken(). > > To me, that's the compiler being correct - quite a different thing from the > code being correct. both functions have the same code. --