http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2642
--- Comment #9 from Sobirari Muhomori <ma...@pochta.ru> 2009-07-09 02:47:55 PDT --- > With or without explicit initialization requirements, you could put that > initialization in the constructors. .init can't be moved to constructor, because you won't be able to set vptr correctly. Possible solution is to generate .init as a static function and inline it (or not) in the user code after call to new. Then call constructor. And trusting malloc to zero memory can be a good optimization. And I don't think .init for primitive types is copied as an array of bytes. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
