http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2973
Andrei Alexandrescu <and...@metalanguage.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |and...@metalanguage.com --- Comment #2 from Andrei Alexandrescu <and...@metalanguage.com> 2009-07-21 19:19:38 PDT --- We currently have: pure nothrow F pow(F)(F x, uint n) if (isFloatingPoint!(F)); pure nothrow F pow(F)(F x, int n) if (isFloatingPoint!(F)); F pow(F)(F x, F y) if (isFloatingPoint!(F)); I think we're in good shape. We could add overloads for raising integrals to unsigned powers but I fear confusion due to wraparound. The magnitudes of exponents for which efficiency could become an issue are also those that would wraparound the result. If no compelling arguments come up, I'll close this soon. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------