http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=314
Stewart Gordon <s...@iname.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |s...@iname.com --- Comment #10 from Stewart Gordon <s...@iname.com> 2009-08-20 11:57:14 PDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Access protection is defined to happen after lookup and overload resolution. Defined where in the spec? > Making private symbols invisible defeats this, Would it be reasonable to change it as I described in the final paragraph of issue 3254 comment 3? > and also doesn't work as the > overload list is a linked list, and making the head of it private would hide > the rest of the possibly public overloads. That's obviously an implementation issue. Possible ways to deal with this: (a) have multiple linked lists, one for each protection attribute (b) build the linked list in such a way that the head element will always be one of the ones of the most public access level that exists among the overloads -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------