--- Comment #4 from Max Samukha <> 2010-04-04 15:17:17 
PDT ---
> The current behavior seems reasonable, because
> 'delete' is never invoked on the object (which is necessary for a custom
> deallocator to be used).

I don't think it is reasonable. Why should I bother to call the deallocator
manually while the allocator is called automatically? Think about object
creation as a transaction consisting of two operations: allocation and
construction. If construction fails, allocation should be automatically rolled

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to