http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2590
--- Comment #4 from Max Samukha <samu...@voliacable.com> 2010-04-04 15:17:17 PDT --- > The current behavior seems reasonable, because > 'delete' is never invoked on the object (which is necessary for a custom > deallocator to be used). I don't think it is reasonable. Why should I bother to call the deallocator manually while the allocator is called automatically? Think about object creation as a transaction consisting of two operations: allocation and construction. If construction fails, allocation should be automatically rolled back. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
