--- Comment #7 from Justin Spahr-Summers <> 
2010-04-05 21:14:23 CDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Not that I disagree this bug is obsolete, but what would you call delete on? 
> With the failed construction, you never got a pointer to the class data.
> If class allocators were to be saved, I think the correct behavior on a failed
> constructor should be to call the deallocator.

Fair point. I didn't realize that it's impossible to hold onto the pointer.

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to