--- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic <> 2010-08-24 
09:55:25 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> It might be a linux-only problem, I'm not sure.  I also have an older machine,
> maybe yours is twice as fast?
> 27 seconds still seems quite long for a small library.
> Re the errors, I'm working on them now, I just downloaded 2.048.  Apparently
> there is some issue with AssumeSorted not working as a range anymore...  It's
> not critical to the library, but the unit tests use it.  I'm just removing the
> assumeSorted for now (as unit test performance isn't important, it was more 
> the
> "correct" thing to do), asked about it in d.learn.

Yeah I guess it could be rather long, there's not that many size and they're
mostly small from what I can tell.

Btw your updated d2.0b library now compiles in 11 seconds on my system with DMD

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to