http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5558
Steven Schveighoffer <schvei...@yahoo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |schvei...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #2 from Steven Schveighoffer <schvei...@yahoo.com> 2011-02-10
11:10:45 PST ---
Actually, I feel that it should work on both sides. The spec states that the
compiler rewrites for example "a + b" as:
try a.opBinary!("+")(b), see if it compiles, if not, try
b.opBinaryRight!("+")(a).
Since the dot operator automatically dereferences, I think it should also in
this case after the rewrite.
Note, opIn_r is not supposed to be used anymore, opBinaryRight!("in") is used,
but it still should be a rewrite. However, the opBinaryRight!("in") doesn't
work at all...
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
