http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5558
--- Comment #3 from Denis Derman <denis.s...@gmail.com> 2011-02-10 13:28:26 PST
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Actually, I feel that it should work on both sides. The spec states that the
> compiler rewrites for example "a + b" as:
>
> try a.opBinary!("+")(b), see if it compiles, if not, try
> b.opBinaryRight!("+")(a).
>
> Since the dot operator automatically dereferences, I think it should also in
> this case after the rewrite.
And unlike opBinary, opIn_r so-to-say says "as right operand", so the compiler
has no excuse ;-) (And does not need to try both possibilities.)
Denis
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
